Reformation of Epicurus's Argument

Can God offer salvation to Christians only? Then he is not omnipotent.Could God offer salvation to non-Christians but chooses not to? Then He is not all-loving. God cannot be as Christianity says.

A great spin-off of Epicurus's argument of evil. It forces one to justify whether blasphemy really is the one unforgivable sin and if it is, whether or not that is the work of a benevolent being. Although, I like Epicurus's better, more general in scope and more strident in defining God.

The original:

WLC & Special Pleading

But is MWH (Many Worlds Hypothesis) as plausible as the design hypothesis?

If MWH is to commend itself as a plausible hypothesis, then some plausible mechanism for generating the many worlds needs to be to be explained.-WLC Reasonable Faith

I wonder if he requires the same standards for his own hypotheses. I have never heard him explain the mechanism behind the design hypothesis and I imagine that he would consider it to be a plausible explanation since he regularly argues for it. It would be interesting to hear how the "changeless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial being of enormous power" WLC routinely argues for actually generates matter into existence but I doubt the mechanism will be publicly declared any time soon. If he has, somebody please link it to me.

Introduction

Hello,
I have a B.S. in Mathematics, minors in IT, and economics, but I am interested in many fields of inquiry. As an avid youtube, blog, and miscellaneous media viewer, I now have an outlet to express my view on the array of topics out there. Expect to find anything here ranging from politics, religion, science, debates, or anything else that may come my way.